So I have these two problems for a homework assignment and I'm stuck on the second one.

  1. Use a Python Set Comprehension (Python's equivalent of Set Builder notation) to generate a set of all of the prime numbers that are less than 100. Recall that a prime number is an integer that is greater than 1 and not divisible by any integer other than itself and 1. Store your set of primes in a variable (you will need it for additional parts). Output your set of primes (e.g., with the print function).

  2. Use a Python Set Comprehension to generate a set of ordered pairs (tuples of length 2) consisting of all of the prime pairs consisting of primes less than 100. A Prime Pair is a pair of consecutive odd numbers that are both prime. Store your set of Prime Pairs in a variable. Your set of number 1 will be very helpful. Output your Set of Prime Pairs.

For the first one, this works perfectly:

r= {x for x in range(2, 101) if not any(x % y == 0 for y in range(2, x))} 

However, I'm pretty stumped on the second one. I think I may have to take the Cartesian product of the set r with something but I'm just not sure.

This gets me somewhat close but I just want the consecutive pairs.

cart = { (x, y) for x in r for y in r if x < y } 
0

3 Answers

primes = {x for x in range(2, 101) if all(x%y for y in range(2, min(x, 11)))} 

I simplified the test a bit - if all(x%y instead of if not any(not x%y

I also limited y's range; there is no point in testing for divisors > sqrt(x). So max(x) == 100 implies max(y) == 10. For x <= 10, y must also be < x.

pairs = {(x, x+2) for x in primes if x+2 in primes} 

Instead of generating pairs of primes and testing them, get one and see if the corresponding higher prime exists.

0

You can get clean and clear solutions by building the appropriate predicates as helper functions. In other words, use the Python set-builder notation the same way you would write the answer with regular mathematics set-notation.

The whole idea behind set comprehensions is to let us write and reason in code the same way we do mathematics by hand.

With an appropriate predicate in hand, problem 1 simplifies to:

 low_primes = {x for x in range(1, 100) if is_prime(x)} 

And problem 2 simplifies to:

 low_prime_pairs = {(x, x+2) for x in range(1,100,2) if is_prime(x) and is_prime(x+2)} 

Note how this code is a direct translation of the problem specification, "A Prime Pair is a pair of consecutive odd numbers that are both prime."

P.S. I'm trying to give you the correct problem solving technique without actually giving away the answer to the homework problem.

1

You can generate pairs like this:

{(x, x + 2) for x in r if x + 2 in r} 

Then all that is left to do is to get a condition to make them prime, which you have already done in the first example.

A different way of doing it: (Although slower for large sets of primes)

{(x, y) for x in r for y in r if x + 2 == y} 
4

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy