I'm looking to get the length of a number in JavaScript or jQuery?

I've tried value.length without any success, do I need to convert this to a string first?

4

17 Answers

var x = 1234567; x.toString().length; 

This process will also work forFloat Number and for Exponential number also.

8

Ok, so many answers, but this is a pure math one, just for the fun or for remembering that Math is Important:

var len = Math.ceil(Math.log(num + 1) / Math.LN10); 

This actually gives the "length" of the number even if it's in exponential form. num is supposed to be a non negative integer here: if it's negative, take its absolute value and adjust the sign afterwards.

Update for ES2015

Now that Math.log10 is a thing, you can simply write

const len = Math.ceil(Math.log10(num + 1)); 
12

Could also use a template string:

const num = 123456 `${num}`.length // 6 
1

You have to make the number to string in order to take length

var num = 123; alert((num + "").length); 

or

alert(num.toString().length); 
1

I've been using this functionality in node.js, this is my fastest implementation so far:

var nLength = function(n) { return (Math.log(Math.abs(n)+1) * 0.43429448190325176 | 0) + 1;  } 

It should handle positive and negative integers (also in exponential form) and should return the length of integer part in floats.

The following reference should provide some insight into the method: Weisstein, Eric W. "Number Length." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource.

I believe that some bitwise operation can replace the Math.abs, but jsperf shows that Math.abs works just fine in the majority of js engines.

Update: As noted in the comments, this solution has some issues :(

Update2 (workaround) : I believe that at some point precision issues kick in and the Math.log(...)*0.434... just behaves unexpectedly. However, if Internet Explorer or Mobile devices are not your cup of tea, you can replace this operation with the Math.log10 function. In Node.js I wrote a quick basic test with the function nLength = (n) => 1 + Math.log10(Math.abs(n) + 1) | 0; and with Math.log10 it worked as expected. Please note that Math.log10 is not universally supported.

8

You should go for the simplest one (stringLength), readability always beats speed. But if you care about speed here are some below.

Three different methods all with varying speed.

// 34ms let weissteinLength = function(n) { return (Math.log(Math.abs(n)+1) * 0.43429448190325176 | 0) + 1; } // 350ms let stringLength = function(n) { return n.toString().length; } // 58ms let mathLength = function(n) { return Math.ceil(Math.log(n + 1) / Math.LN10); } // Simple tests below if you care about performance. let iterations = 1000000; let maxSize = 10000; // ------ Weisstein length. console.log("Starting weissteinLength length."); let startTime = Date.now(); for (let index = 0; index < iterations; index++) { weissteinLength(Math.random() * maxSize); } console.log("Ended weissteinLength length. Took : " + (Date.now() - startTime ) + "ms"); // ------- String length slowest. console.log("Starting string length."); startTime = Date.now(); for (let index = 0; index < iterations; index++) { stringLength(Math.random() * maxSize); } console.log("Ended string length. Took : " + (Date.now() - startTime ) + "ms"); // ------- Math length. console.log("Starting math length."); startTime = Date.now(); for (let index = 0; index < iterations; index++) { mathLength(Math.random() * maxSize); } 
2

There are three way to do it.

var num = 123; alert(num.toString().length); 

better performance one (best performance in ie11)

var num = 123; alert((num + '').length); 

Math (best performance in Chrome, firefox but slowest in ie11)

var num = 123 alert(Math.floor( Math.log(num) / Math.LN10 ) + 1) 

there is a jspref here

0

First convert it to a string:

var mynumber = 123; alert((""+mynumber).length); 

Adding an empty string to it will implicitly cause mynumber to turn into a string.

1

Well without converting the integer to a string you could make a funky loop:

var number = 20000; var length = 0; for(i = number; i > 1; ++i){ ++length; i = Math.floor(i/10); } alert(length);​ 

Demo:

2

I got asked a similar question in a test.

Find a number's length without converting to string

const numbers = [1, 10, 100, 12, 123, -1, -10, -100, -12, -123, 0, -0] const numberLength = number => { let length = 0 let n = Math.abs(number) do { n /= 10 length++ } while (n >= 1) return length } console.log(numbers.map(numberLength)) // [ 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 1 ] 

Negative numbers were added to complicate it a little more, hence the Math.abs().

A way for integers or for length of the integer part without banal converting to string:

var num = 9999999999; // your number if (num < 0) num = -num; // this string for negative numbers var length = 1; while (num >= 10) { num /= 10; length++; } alert(length); 
2

I would like to correct the @Neal answer which was pretty good for integers, but the number 1 would return a length of 0 in the previous case.

function Longueur(numberlen) { var length = 0, i; //define `i` with `var` as not to clutter the global scope numberlen = parseInt(numberlen); for(i = numberlen; i >= 1; i) { ++length; i = Math.floor(i/10); } return length; } 

As now we have a template literal, can also write it as:

let a = 123 console.log(`${a}`.length) // 3 

I'm perplex about converting into a string the given number because such an algorithm won't be robust and will be prone to errors: it will show all its limitations especially in case it has to evaluate very long numbers. In fact before converting the long number into a string it will "collapse" into its exponential notation equivalent (example: 1.2345e4). This notation will be converted into a string and this resulting string will be evaluated for returning its length. All of this will give a wrong result. So I suggest not to use that approach.

Have a look at the following code and run the code snippet to compare the different behaviors:

let num = 116234567891011121415113441236542134465236441625344625344625623456723423523429798771121411511034412365421344652364416253446253446254461253446221314623879235441623683749283441136232514654296853446323214617456789101112141511344122354416236837492834411362325146542968534463232146172368374928344113623251465429685; let lenFromMath; let lenFromString; // The suggested way: lenFromMath = Math.ceil(Math.log10(num + 1)); // this works in fact returns 309 // The discouraged way: lenFromString = String(num).split("").length; // this doesn't work in fact returns 23 /*It is also possible to modify the prototype of the primitive "Number" (but some programmer might suggest this is not a good practice). But this is will also work:*/ Number.prototype.lenght = () => {return Math.ceil(Math.log10(num + 1));} lenFromPrototype = num.lenght(); console.log({lenFromMath, lenFromPrototype, lenFromString});

Try this:

$("#element").text().length; 

Example of it in use

0

Yes you need to convert to string in order to find the length.For example

var x=100;// type of x is number var x=100+"";// now the type of x is string document.write(x.length);//which would output 3. 
0

To get the number of relevant digits (if the leading decimal part is 0 then the whole part has a length of 0) of any number separated by whole part and decimal part I use:

function getNumberLength(x) { let numberText = x.toString(); let exp = 0; if (numberText.includes('e')) { const [coefficient, base] = numberText.split('e'); exp = parseInt(base, 10); numberText = coefficient; } const [whole, decimal] = numberText.split('.'); const wholeLength = whole === '0' ? 0 : whole.length; const decimalLength = decimal ? decimal.length : 0; return { whole: wholeLength > -exp ? wholeLength + exp : 0, decimal: decimalLength > exp ? decimalLength - exp : 0, }; }